From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] pg_serial early wraparound |
Date: | 2018-03-30 19:14:22 |
Message-ID: | 1697.1522437262@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 5:50 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I'm a little worried because Anastasia couldn't repeat the test;
>> why is that?
> Hmm. I'm not sure. It works for me on a couple of machines and what I see is:
Yeah, it works for me too, so not sure what the problem was.
The only other point I can think of is that by changing the storage
layout under pg_serial/, this'd create an issue for pg_upgrade, if
pg_upgrade tried to migrate this data. But it doesn't.
Hence, pushed.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2018-03-30 20:15:39 | Re: file cloning in pg_upgrade and CREATE DATABASE |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2018-03-30 19:07:14 | Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions |