Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2019-05-07 09:17:11 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
>> Well, it rejiggers the way table locks are acquired for all REINDEX
>> INDEX commands, not just in the CONCURRENTLY. But yea, it's probably
>> easy to catch issues there on user tables.
> Pushed now.
OK. I marked the open issue as closed.
regards, tom lane