Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers

From: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers
Date: 2014-06-30 16:22:21
Message-ID: 1404145341.1852.YahooMailNeo@web122301.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:

> It's missing a few pieces like surfacing transition table names.
> I'll work on those.  Also, it's not clear to me how to access the
> pre- and post- relations at the same time, this being necessary
> for many use cases.  I guess I need to think more about how that
> would be done.

If you're going to do any work on the C extension, please start
from the attached.  I renamed it to something which seemed more
meaningful (to me, at least), and cleaned up some cosmetic issues.
The substance is the same.

--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Attachment Content-Type Size
transition-table-c-v2.diff text/x-diff 8.0 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message geohas 2014-06-30 16:37:32 Does changing attribute order breaks something?
Previous Message Andres Freund 2014-06-30 16:20:38 Re: Spinlocks and compiler/memory barriers