Re: Index AM API cleanup

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Index AM API cleanup
Date: 2025-03-12 10:40:44
Message-ID: 06419469-03dc-4824-9c74-615afccbf9d9@eisentraut.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

While studying the patch "[PATCH v21 08/12] Allow non-btree indexes to
participate in mergejoin", I figured we could do the sortsupport.c piece
much simpler. The underlying issue there is similar to commits
0d2aa4d4937 and c594f1ad2ba: We're just using the btree strategy numbers
to pass information about the sort direction. We can do this simpler by
just passing a bool. See attached patch.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v21.1-0001-Simplify-and-generalize-PrepareSortSupportFrom.patch text/plain 6.4 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip Kumar 2025-03-12 10:45:29 Re: Add an option to skip loading missing publication to avoid logical replication failure
Previous Message Chiranmoy.Bhattacharya@fujitsu.com 2025-03-12 10:34:46 Re: [PATCH] SVE popcount support