From: | "Euler Taveira" <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Tomas Vondra" <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Thomas Munro" <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Michael Paquier" <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | "Euler Taveira" <euler(dot)taveira(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Anastasia Lubennikova" <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "Tomas Vondra" <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: cleanup temporary files after crash |
Date: | 2021-03-18 21:44:53 |
Message-ID: | 05d307fc-8391-4091-b279-1b3214658f10@www.fastmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021, at 6:00 PM, Euler Taveira wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021, at 5:51 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>> OK. Can you prepare a patch with the proposed test approach?
> I'm on it.
What do you think about this patch?
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
fix-crash-temp-files.patch | text/x-patch | 4.1 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2021-03-18 21:51:28 | Re: Getting better results from valgrind leak tracking |
Previous Message | Matthias van de Meent | 2021-03-18 21:30:36 | Re: non-HOT update not looking at FSM for large tuple update |