From: | Ben Hockey <neonstalwart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | ecmascript 5 DATESTYLE |
Date: | 2010-05-18 22:26:18 |
Message-ID: | EC26F5CE-9F3B-40C9-BF23-F0C2B96E388C@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
hi,
i mistakenly had posted this to pgsql-bugs already and got a response
(see below - edited). i'm posting here since afaik it is the way i
should be requesting new features. my suggestion is to add a
DATESTYLE format to match the format specified for date time strings
in ecmascript 5.
the following is from the ecmascript 5 specification at http://www.ecmascript.org/docs/tc39-2009-043.pdf
page 168:
> 15.9.1.15 Date Time String Format
> ECMAScript defines a string interchange format for date-times based
> upon a simplification of the ISO 8601
> Extended Format. The format is as follows: YYYY-MM-DDTHH:mm:ss.sssZ
ecmascript 5 is the most recent specification for JavaScript and i
would think that having a DATESTYLE format to simplify
interoperability with JavaScript applications would be highly desirable.
thanks,
ben...
On May 16, 2010, at 2:22 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> I have nothing against some new datestyles - xml, ecma5 and I am able
> to add to pg when hackers will agree
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Florian Pflug | 2010-05-19 00:15:42 | Re: Row-level Locks & SERIALIZABLE transactions, postgres vs. Oracle |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-05-18 21:37:39 | Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay |