Re: Remaining work for 1.16

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
Cc: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Remaining work for 1.16
Date: 2012-04-23 08:12:37
Message-ID: CA+OCxoziMHzdeM1PXAjN_qXJ9N+KT5kHRD45kxbs=1dYe=dMrw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> I've been working all day on three patches:
>
>  * indexes, quite hard work still to be done
>  * domains, still one issue to fix
>  * range type support, ready to commit
>
> With the last one, I think we have a complete support of 9.2. The only
> really missing feature is the --exclude-table-data on the backup window,
> not a show-stopper. So I guess we're in good shape.
>
> About the database designer, I began some work to answer some of Dave's
> comments. Unfortunately, it's a lot of work, it's not finished, and I
> don't have much motivation to finish this patch. I would agree to put
> the database designer on a specific branch, so that we could work on it
> during the next release development period.

I'm afraid we may have to. Even besides the basic issues I found,
Colin seems to be finding more with alarming regularity.

> When the three patches will be commited and pushed, I guess I'll work on
> debug and docs only. I intend to look at all dialogs and forms, document
> them, and debug them (and also find the missing feature if there is).

Thanks for the hard work Guillaume.

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2012-04-23 08:14:15 Re: Incorrect domain logic for 9.1
Previous Message Thom Brown 2012-04-21 21:21:59 Incorrect domain logic for 9.1