spoonbill vs. -HEAD

From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>
To: Postgresql Hackers Mailinglist <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: spoonbill vs. -HEAD
Date: 2013-03-26 18:50:05
Message-ID: 5151EDDD.9080004@kaltenbrunner.cc
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi all!

I finally started to investigate why spoonbill stopped reporting to the
buildfarm feedback about 2 months ago.
It seems that the foreign-keys locking patch (or something commity very
close to January 23th) broke it in a fairly annoying way - running the
buildfarm script seems to
consistently "stall" during the isolationtester part of the regression
testing leaving the postgresql instance running causing all future
buildfarm runs to fail...

The process listing at that time looks like:

https://www.kaltenbrunner.cc/files/process_listing.txt

pg_stats_activity of the running instance:

https://www.kaltenbrunner.cc/files/pg_stat_activity.txt

pg_locks:

https://www.kaltenbrunner.cc/files/pg_locks.txt

backtraces of the three backends:

https://www.kaltenbrunner.cc/files/bt_20467.txt
https://www.kaltenbrunner.cc/files/bt_20897.txt
https://www.kaltenbrunner.cc/files/bt_24285.txt

Stefan

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2013-03-26 19:02:24 Re: sql_drop Event Triggerg
Previous Message Gavin Flower 2013-03-26 18:49:14 Re: adding support for zero-attribute unique/etc keys