| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM> |
| Cc: | "'The Hermit Hacker'" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: xlog patches reviewed |
| Date: | 2001-03-13 02:03:09 |
| Message-ID: | 17254.984448989@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>> if this is the case, can we look at applying that patch
>> tonight, give ppl till Friday to test and put out a RC1
>> depending on the results?
Patch committed. There are still some loose ends to clean up:
* I need to finish making an xlog-reset utility for contrib.
* I stubbed out shmctl(IPC_STAT) in the BeOS and QNX4 emulations of
SysV shared memory (src/backend/port/beos/shm.c,
src/backend/port/qnx4/shm.c). This means that the new code to detect
postmaster-dead-but-old-backends-still-running will never detect any
problem on those platforms. Perhaps people who use those platforms
can test and contribute real implementations?
However, these shouldn't affect testing.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Philip Warner | 2001-03-13 02:22:37 | Re: Performance monitor signal handler |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-03-13 01:47:20 | Re: Do we still need PowerPC-specific timestamp_is_current/epoch? |