| From: | Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)PostgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | 9.6 -> 10.0 |
| Date: | 2016-03-22 14:07:42 |
| Message-ID: | 1458655662.32508.11.camel@gunduz.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Hi,
I've been ranting about this on Twitter for a while, and now blogged about it:
http://people.planetpostgresql.org/devrim/index.php?/archives/89-9.6,-or-10.0.html
There are major changes in 9.6 (some of them are listed in the blog post), and
I think they are good enough to call this 10.0.
A counter argument might be waiting for pglogical for inclusion, but I think
the current changes are enough to warrant a .0 release.
What do you think?
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Justin Clift | 2016-03-22 14:10:46 | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2016-03-22 13:48:27 | Re: [ANNOUNCE] Save the Date: PgConf Silicon Valley 2016 |