From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | depesz <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: check constraint validation takes access exclusive locks |
Date: | 2012-02-27 13:52:33 |
Message-ID: | 1330350691-sup-1@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Pavel Stehule's message of lun feb 27 10:41:32 -0300 2012:
>
> 2012/2/27 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>:
> >
> > Excerpts from hubert depesz lubaczewski's message of lun feb 27 10:02:57 -0300 2012:
> >> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 03:04:28PM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> >> > Hello
> >> >
> >> > I rechecked Depesz's article -
> >> > http://www.depesz.com/2011/07/01/waiting-for-9-2-not-valid-checks/
> >> >
> >> > The behave of current HEAD is different than behave described in article.
> >> >
> >> > "alter table a validate constraint a_a_check" needs a access exclusive
> >> > locks and blocks table modification - I tested inserts.
> >
> >> yes, looks like we have revert to access exclusive lock:
> >
> > See commits
> > 2c3d9db56d5d49bdc777b174982251c01348e3d8
> > and
> > a195e3c34f1eeb6a607c342121edf48e49067ea9
>
> this block a sense of NOT VALIDATE constraints.
Yeah :-(
> Is it final behave or will be fixed on 9.2?
It's final for 9.2 AFAIK. It's supposed to get fixed during the 9.3
timeframe.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2012-02-27 13:59:30 | Re: check constraint validation takes access exclusive locks |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2012-02-27 13:41:32 | Re: check constraint validation takes access exclusive locks |